Search for: "Terry v. Terry" Results 1 - 20 of 2,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Judge Terry Doughty’s opinion: “Various emails show Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits through evidence that the motivation of the NIAID Defendants was a ‘take down’ of protected free speech. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
DeMitchell, Richard Fossey, and Terri A. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am by Giles Peaker
Kyle v Coventry City Council (2023) EWCA Civ 1360 Yes, I am very late with this one. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
District Judge Terry Doughty issued an order that limited communications between the White House and several government agencies about virtually all content. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]