Search for: "Texaco, Inc. v. Short" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Passport Video, 349 F.3d 622, 628 (9th Cir. 2003), or pawn the work off as its own, Triangle Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Before turning to the new development, and for the purpose of putting things in the proper perspective, I would like to quote at some length from Texaco’s appellate brief in Aguinda v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm by PaulKostro
Texaco, Inc. 659 F.2d 551, 553 (5th Cir. 1981) (finding trial court “possesses the inherent procedural power to reconsider, rescind, or modify an interlocutory order for cause seen by it to be sufficient”); Ford, supra, 188 N.J. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Texaco Inc., 60 F.3d 913, 930 (2d Cir. 1994). [2017-02-17_mpaa-ifta-sag-aftra_amicus-brief]. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Texaco Inc., 60 F.3d 913, 930 (2d Cir. 1994). [2017-02-17_mpaa-ifta-sag-aftra_amicus-brief]. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
”[29] And that’s a short list. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Unfortunately, when negotiations between the parties break down, letters of intent are often at the center of litigation.[2] In perhaps the most famous example of litigation around the enforceability of a letter of intent, Pennzoil won a judgment against Texaco for $10.5 billion, and Texaco was forced to seek bankruptcy protection.[3] Despite the legal risks, companies continue to use letters of intent. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am by Steven Boutwell
With the above context in mind, we now turn to McBride which, for a short time, brought punitive damages back to the high point of Merry Shipping. [read post]