Search for: "Texas Co. v. Brown" Results 301 - 320 of 470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
”  It was not until 1954, in Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
There is authority under state law that payments to witnesses to provide favorable testimony do in fact constitute bribery.[10]  For example, the Texas Penal Code provides that:[11] “(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to influence the witness, he offers, confers, or agrees to confer any benefit on a witness or prospective witness in an official proceeding[[12]] or coerces a witness or prospective witness in an official proceeding: (1) to testify falsely; (2) to… [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:05 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Co., a 2005 case out of the Eastern District of Texas that held that “a private compromise of claims under the FLSA is permissible where there exists a bona fide dispute as to liability. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by David Gans
  Much of Moreno’s piece does not even address the facts, preferring instead to attack civil rights advocates from Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
These limits will deter the kind of recalcitrance associated with massive resistance to desegregation that the Supreme Court invited with the “all deliberate speed” formulation of Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That day fell on the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1351 n.2 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Sebelius: Parts III.A, III.B, III.C, and III.D] On July 9, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP)   Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Compliance with Court Order requiring election of claims does not bar later assertion of non-elected claims: LML Patent Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]