Search for: "Texas v. Louisiana"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 9:39 am
Only employers in Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas, and Louisiana should continue operating under the prior definition of a “spouse” for FMLA purposes. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:07 am
See Blum v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
The effect of these clauses in Texas, has always been questionable in light of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:00 am
The lawsuit, brought by Texas and Louisiana, not only impacts the future of immigration enforcement in the country but also may impact the right of states to sue the federal government over discretionary policies. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
" As noted in our amicus brief, that the state of Louisiana—which, like Texas, is also in the Fifth Circuit—is another such "rogue" state. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:03 pm
In 1971 the Texas Supreme Court in Getty Oil Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Such is the case in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
According to the court’s ruling, the public has an “abiding interest” in protecting state laws from “federal encroachment” (Texas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
On January 12, 2023, the Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals (the “Board”) granted a motion for partial summary judgment in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:23 am
In Riddle v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm
Evans Industries, Inc., (Evans) operated a series of five leased facilities in Louisiana and Texas that manufactured, filled, warehoused and distributed steel drums and industrial containers. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Louisiana, 391 U. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:40 pm
In the case at issue, Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am
While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
On December 9, 20103, the Southern District of Florida in Renzi v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:16 am
"Sackett v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
But in the recent Kennedy v. [read post]
