Search for: "The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2008, 4:23 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15, 92 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15, 92 S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:40 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), or under principles of fiduciary duty. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
In M/S Bremen v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10 (1972), the Supreme Court held that a forum-selection clause is “prima facie valid and should be enforced unless enforcement is shown by the resisting party to be ‘unreasonable’ under the circumstances. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:24 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 12-15, 92 S. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
In M/S Bremen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:06 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. as relevant to choice-of-forum clauses, not choice-of-law clauses. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10-15, 92 S. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:21 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1) criticized such thinking in part because forum selection clauses often provide consistency and certainty. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Zapata Off–Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972) (holding forum selection clause may be found unreasonable if “(1) [its] formation was induced by fraud or over-reaching; (2) the complaining party ‘will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court’ because of the grave inconvenience or un-fairness of the selected forum; (3) the fundamental unfairness of the chosen law may deprive the plaintiff of a remedy; or (4) [its] enforcement would… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
Zapata Off–Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972) (holding forum selection clause may be found unreasonable if “(1) [its] formation was induced by fraud or over-reaching; (2) the complaining party ‘will for all practical purposes be deprived of his day in court’ because of the grave inconvenience or un-fairness of the selected forum; (3) the fundamental unfairness of the chosen law may deprive the plaintiff of a remedy; or (4) [its] enforcement would… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:32 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972), held that the inconvenience of litigating in a foreign forum doesn't warrant setting aside a selection clause "where it can be said with reasonable assurance" that at the time the contract was made the parties contemplated the claimed inconvenience. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:30 am
Supreme Court in The Bremen v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
