Search for: "The Chinese Exclusion Case" Results 1 - 20 of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 1:57 am by Immigration Prof
Embracing the Chinese Exclusion Case: A Back-Door Solution to Racial Exclusions by Lauri Kai, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 59, 2018, Forthcoming Abstract On December 7, 2015, Donald J. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Price, Emory University School of Law, has posted A ‘Chinese Wall’ at the Nation’s Borders: Justice Stephen Field and the Chinese Exclusion Case, which appeared in volume 43 of the Journal of Supreme Court History (March 2018):The Chinese Exclusion Case was the first of a series of cases in the early Progressive Era about immigration. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:08 pm by Susan I. Nelson
Like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Trump's proposal to exclude all Muslims is "induced by blind racism and eagerness to deflect blame onto other groups. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:36 am
Hopkins and the Chinese Exclusion Case by situating them in the [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:27 pm
Charles Reichmann, UC Berkeley School of Law, has published Anti-Chinese Racism at Berkeley: The Case for Renaming Boalt Hall. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 8:27 pm by Christine Corcos
Charles Reichmann, UC Berkeley School of Law, has published Anti-Chinese Racism at Berkeley: The Case for Renaming Boalt Hall. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ping’s lawsuit, the Chinese Exclusion Case, would go before the Supreme Court in 1889 and, as Polly Price argued in a recent lecture sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society, provide a foundation for immigration case law in the Progressive Era. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 7:20 pm
"The Ghost of Chae Chan Ping: A Chinese-exclusion case from the 1880s set a precedent that haunts the legal fight over Trump's travel ban. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:37 pm by JP Sarmiento
Case: Motion to Reopen / Terminate with the Immigration Court Nationality: Chinese Location: Newark, NJ Our client had a final order of exclusion from the Newark Immigration Court in 1992. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     Alfred Deakin (credit)This article looks at perhaps the best-known Australian constitutional case of the nineteenth Chung Teong Toy v Musgrove (1888), in which a challenge to the power of the colony of Victoria to exclude Chinese immigrants led the Supreme Court to undertake a fundamental examination of the status and powers of the Executive under the colony's constitution. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 12:37 pm by Dan Harris
Bottom Line:  Chinese companies love claiming something has to be done a particular way in China whether that is really the case is not. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:57 am by Steve Dickinson
The Chinese manufacturer will only agree to provide exclusive rights to the foreign buyer in a case where the foreign buyer agrees to pay a price for that exclusivity. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:30 am by Francisco Garcia
Some believe that the clause provides an absolute exclusion for damages caused by any sort of pollutant, including asbestos, lead, or fumes from Chinese drywall. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:43 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As this case demonstrates, it is critically important for the standard pollution exclusion to be revised to carve back coverage for securities claims and derivative claims based on environmental disclosures. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:27 am by Dan Harris
Third, Chinese courts base their rulings almost exclusively on documentary evidence, not testimony. [read post]