Search for: "The Dear Rich Staff" Results 61 - 80 of 529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 6:27 am
Dear Rich: I just came across your blog entry on repurposed goods and the first sale doctrine. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:55 am
The Dear Rich staff has dug deep into its volumes of legal blather and pulled out the following basic permission form, modified from an agreement in our helpful tome, Getting Permission. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
The Dear Rich Staff believes that if you want to be prudent, you should return to the artist and seek permission. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:27 am
Dear Rich: Can you patent an invention that was designed by invention software? [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
Finally, in case you're unaware, the Dear Rich Staff advises that you won't acquire a federal registration unless you use the mark in commerce. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
Feel free to use the bird and the plant in the photo above, taken by the always obliging Dear Rich Staff. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:05 pm by The Dear Rich Staff
B's name as Lindsay; the hypervigilant Dear Rich Staff reports that it's actually the more common male variant, Lindsey (placing #834 among male names -- compared to #1211 for Lindsay).  [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
We have a feeling you're kidding but since the Dear Rich staff has a near-empty mailbag, we'll provide an answer anyway. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:36 am
(The Dear Rich staff has provided considerable advice on fair use here.) [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
The Dear Rich Staff shall return to posting blog entries after we have atoned sufficiently. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:23 pm
So, the Dear Rich Staff is not clear why the executors are demanding the return of the documents ... but again, this points to the fact that you should seek representation. . [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:17 pm
The Dear Rich staff finds itself even more obsessed with celebrity questions including: Do celebrities smell worse than the rest of us? [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:10 am
The Dear Rich Staff reports that work made for hire status is determined by the original act of authorship -- that is, who is the author and under what conditions the work is created. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:55 am
The Dear Rich Staff went to the always-helpful (and now-legendary) David Pressman, author of Patent It Yourself (insert FTC disclaimer), for some help with your other questions. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:05 am
The Dear Rich Staff is pretty sure you're not going to run into a problem. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
If you have deposited the check and wish that you hadn't, the Dear Rich Staff advises that most state statutes  -- check your state's U.C.C.  [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:22 pm
" The Dear Rich staff was upset to learn of your treatment. [read post]