Search for: "The Delaware Railroad Tax" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Why not a fee on train passengers to pay for the bridges that toll roads need to build to go over or under railroad tracks? [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Jan. 29, 2008) did not compel a holding that the tax could not be imposed; and 3) the tax was applied only to vehicles delivered in Delaware.. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
The State of Delaware, industry and environmental organizations, and an industry intervenor challenge a final rule of the Environmental Protection Agency governing the use of Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines ("backup generators" or "emergency engines"). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:11 pm by Jon Gelman
• Rail Safety: In 2008, Senator Lautenberg’s overhaul of railroad safety laws was signed into law, requiring railroads to improve safety by limiting hours of service, improving grade crossing safety and requiring new safety technology that will improve safety for rail passengers, automobile drivers and communities near rail lines. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:23 am by Donna
If the company is violating the law – Medicare fraud, ripping off the government, failing to pay taxes, failing to pay wages, discriminating, polluting, etc., there are a host of whistleblower laws that may protect you. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. § 11501(b)(4). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
This is Part I of VII of a brief recap of some the significant environmental law and administrative cases decided in the past few months: I. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]