Search for: "The Franklin Company v. the United States" Results 81 - 100 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 6:13 am
  Whether the word “racist” is used as a noun or an adjective in combination with other words does not matter.Second, in my view, the majority misapplies the United States Supreme Court opinions in Milkovich v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
During a poker game, Roosevelt asked Jackson how he had voted in Southern Steamship Company v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Jennifer Ko
Supreme Court decisions: Hughes v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE the judgment. 08a0383p.06 Franklin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 12:44 pm by Todd N. Tucker
United States—were 8-1 and 9-0 rulings against the so-called First New Deal. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
The sanctions are part of a “maximum pressure campaign” by the White House meant to force North Korea to negotiate with the United States over aspects of its nuclear program. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
Estes Forwarding Worldwide (EFW), a transportation logistics company, fired Marcelo Cuellar. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]