Search for: "The James Wells v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 1,752
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2012, 10:00 am by Wells Bennett
So asks Judge James Pohl,  in an order he reportedly issued yesterday in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
The motion to compel implicated FBI interview summaries (Form 302s) that the prosecution says were redacted for reasons of relevancy and privilege, as well as witness testimony withheld for reasons of relevance and materiality. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
With respect to the applicability of the Constitution, Dixon cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 10:46 am by Liz Hayes
Americans United in July filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:00 am by Nick Dranias
Well over a dozen state legislatures are currently considering or have even already passed the necessary Article V resolutions just this session alone. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:50 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This article critiques the concurring opinion in the recent United States Supreme Court personal jurisdiction decision in J. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by EMMY GIBBS, ATLEU
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
Accordingly, the United States does not ask the district court to grant any relief to the plaintiff, nor to enjoin enforcement of section 3 of DOMA; it only argues that the district court should deny the motion to dismiss. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On February 7, 1795, the 11th Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect with ratification by North Carolina. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On February 7, 1795, the 11th Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect with ratification by North Carolina. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]