Search for: "The James Wells v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 2,345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2013, 5:42 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court's recent Windsor decision, as well as its earlier decision in Roemer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Trump’s contention that every officer of the United States must be appointed, not elected, therefore appears to be at odds with what the federal government actually did when it enacted the Oath Act, as well as with the oath Adams took two days later. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
As the Chief Judge of the Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, I have detailed myself as the Military Judge in United States v Abd al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Abdu Al-Nashiri. 2. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:45 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as the analogous provisions of New Jersey state law, set rules concerning the manner in which officers can search a person, and/or their home, office or vehicle. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
The General Government; Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Constitution of the United States Articles I–III --Notes and Questions --James Madison, The Federalist No. 47 --United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
"  How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Problem 8 --James Madison, The Federalist No. 51 --Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 84 --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, December 20, 1787 --Brutus II [Antifederalist Paper No. 84] --Poe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:09 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
James is not an earth shattering decision, although it is seemingly  inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court decision in Berkemer v. [read post]