Search for: "The Jane v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 788
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
By now, the United States has had the experience of having a woman of color serve as Vice President—the first time someone who is not white or not a man has held that office. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 10:15 am
A new case questions a long-held understanding of termination’s impact outside the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm
At a juncture when both democratic and authoritarian regimes across the world are vested to persecuting their host Muslim populations, The New Crusades interrogates–through trenchant analysis and direct testimony of Muslims on the ground–how Islamophobia stands as a unifying global thread of both state and societal bigotry. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Russian citizens Anton Napolsky and Valeriia Ermakova were facing extradition to the United States after a judge approved their transfer. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:05 am
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton, 75 Ala. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
25 May 2024, 1:57 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Skrmetti, and Jane Doe 1 v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
United States and asked whether I would post on the decision here. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:45 pm
United States that the statute applied to any act “designed to defraud by representations as to the past or present, or suggestions and promises as to the future. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
United States (U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug. 1, 2023); United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
At issue legally is Title 17 of the United States Code. [read post]
