Search for: "The Jane v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Meanwhile, Russia’s anger has also been roused by the United States’s activation of a missile defense site in Romania. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
United States which held that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program conflicted with limits on executive authority in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
Also: It is difficult to conceive of how online user reviews – at least in their current form – could continue to exist in the United States without Section 230. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
The lunacy on display came from the Lyndon La Rouche followers--but that's been a steady state condition since at least the mid 1970s when they were claiming that US nuclear plants were better built than Jane Fonda--which assumes a fact not in evidence. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Tara Hofbauer
In Syria, the Islamic State appears to be taking a beating from the Kurdish People’s Protection Unit (YPG). [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Danielle Citron
 With today’s technologies, memory decay has all but disappeared, at least in the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am by SHG
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]