Search for: "The Jane v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by Amy Howe
The legal battle began last fall, when Jane Doe – a 17-year-old who was then approximately eight weeks pregnant – tried to enter the United States illegally, without any adult family members accompanying her. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am by kwalters
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am by John Stephen
In Jane Doe v City of Detroit, the court upheld summary judgment for Detroit on a transgender employee’s complaint of harassment. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:18 am by David Freedman
International Group, Inc., Jane Seybert filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania claiming that her supervisor, Brett Marchand, subjected her to gender-based harassment. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:26 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Trapp, The ICJ and International Terrorism Articles on the Law and Practise of the United Nations (General Section) Nina Cozzi, Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: the Missing Link between Equal Pay and Unpaid Care and Domestic Work Philipp Janig, Jane A. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Constitution, which states that the nation’s “judicial Power” shallextend to all Cases . . . arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, . . . to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between . . . between a State and Citizens of another State; [and] between Citizens of different States. . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
  In Abbott, the Court will construe the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which the United States is a party. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, Michael Kagan has “initial reactions” to the federal government’s opening brief in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
However, when the trial court’s ruling involves libelous speech, the United States Supreme Court has indicated that independent appellate review is proper. [read post]