Search for: "The Jane v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm
The legal battle began last fall, when Jane Doe – a 17-year-old who was then approximately eight weeks pregnant – tried to enter the United States illegally, without any adult family members accompanying her. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:14 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:23 am
The United States was among the few nations to fail and dramatically regress. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:24 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
In Jane Doe v City of Detroit, the court upheld summary judgment for Detroit on a transgender employee’s complaint of harassment. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:18 am
International Group, Inc., Jane Seybert filed suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania claiming that her supervisor, Brett Marchand, subjected her to gender-based harassment. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
Trapp, The ICJ and International Terrorism Articles on the Law and Practise of the United Nations (General Section) Nina Cozzi, Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: the Missing Link between Equal Pay and Unpaid Care and Domestic Work Philipp Janig, Jane A. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Constitution, which states that the nation’s “judicial Power” shallextend to all Cases . . . arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, . . . to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between . . . between a State and Citizens of another State; [and] between Citizens of different States. . . . [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:45 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Jane Doe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
In Abbott, the Court will construe the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, to which the United States is a party. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
In Jane Doe #2 v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am
” At Notice and Comment, Michael Kagan has “initial reactions” to the federal government’s opening brief in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
However, when the trial court’s ruling involves libelous speech, the United States Supreme Court has indicated that independent appellate review is proper. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:49 pm
A jury in the case of Jane Doe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:17 am
Her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
