Search for: "The Jane v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
” At Notice and Comment, Michael Kagan has “initial reactions” to the federal government’s opening brief in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm by Thomas Hopson
Judge Jane Kelly was confirmed to the Eighth Circuit by a vote of ninety-six to zero. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Rodriguez-Dod, The Intersection of Law, Religion, and Infectious Disease on the Handling and Disposition of Human Remains, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Finally, in this section would we mention two items of news of interest to media lawyers: Kim Janes, senior clerk at 5RB for the last 25 years, has retired. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Immigration Prof
SCOTUSBlog has posted the various briefs filed in connection with the pending certiorari petition in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
On 2nd November 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Regina (Wang Yam) v the Central Criminal Court and Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York . . . granted Bernardin's motion to dismiss, holding that Sewell's claims were time-barred under the CFAA's and SCA's applicable two-year statutes of limitations. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
However, when the trial court’s ruling involves libelous speech, the United States Supreme Court has indicated that independent appellate review is proper. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
  And it went on to explain that [t]o that end, the United States Supreme Court has considered the type of speech at issue when determining the appropriate standards to apply in defamation cases. [read post]