Search for: "The Justices v. Murray" Results 1 - 20 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2020, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
And, although we have made some progress since 1946, our criminal justice system is still notoriously racist. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  They narrate the story—in which the Cherokee Nation’s startling victory in Worcester v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
That plea also supported the Claimant’s application that the hearing proceed in private, since there is an established principle that the court must adapt its procedures to ensure that it does not provide encouragement or assistance to blackmailers, and does not deter victims of blackmail from seeking justice from the courts (as is made clear in ZAM v CFM and TFW [2013] EWHC 662 (QB) at [39]-[41] and [44] and in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB) at [2]). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am by Howard Friedman
Austria: The Folly of Europe, [Abstract], 5 Journal of Global Justice & Public Policy 83-105 (2019).Mark Tushnet, Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down the judgment in Riley v Murray [2020] EWHC 997 (QB). [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Free Beacon, Kevin Daley reports that Monday’s decision in Ramos v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) will seek to gather evidence from families with children and all professionals working in the family justice system, including judges, barristers, solicitors, Cafcass workers, court staff and social workers. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
  The Transparency Project has had a series of posts on “Remote Justice”: Remote Justice: A legal blogger’s perspective Remote Justice : A Judge’s perspective Remote justice: a family perspective Remote hearings: a gulf between lawyers and lay parties? [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray and Leah Litman “recap the argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Siegel & Melissa Murray, Introduction: Reproductive Rights and Justice Stories, (Forthcoming).David S. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
This morning the justices will hear two oral arguments. [read post]