Search for: "The Justices v. Murray" Results 301 - 320 of 475
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by ReconciliAction YEG
Past I.P.C. recipients include Justice Murray Sinclair, Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, Metis lawyer Jean Teillet and professor John Burrows to name a few. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Murray, University of California, Berkeley School of LawNeil S. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Acumen Law v Nguyen 2018 BCSC 961, Murray J assessed damages for defamation on a default judgment in the sum of $1. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:42 pm by Don Murray
  Does this sound like some sort of frontier justice from 1830 in some saloon? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by SHG
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the deciding vote in 2003’s Grutter v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  He has posts about the cases of Cripps v Vakras and Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation v Di Masi. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:30 am by Joshua A. Geltzer
Murray Snow determined that Arpaio was violating the Constitution by systematically targeting for traffic stops those who looked Latino and detaining those who were deemed undocumented, and ordered Arpaio to stop. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
Four years later, the Chief Justice again emphasized the need to base the operation of the Voting Rights Act on current data in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am by Eric Yap
 Faced with the male Justices’ insensitivities during oral argument in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am by Andrew Hamm
” Stephanie Murray of Politico reports that Democrat Barbara L’Italien, who is running for Congress from Massachusetts, has declared “her intention to file an impeachment resolution against [Justice Clarence] Thomas as part of an effort to address sexual assault if elected. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am by Stephen Page
The court reaffirmed the principles of when a lawyer might be required to pay costs:In Cassidy v Murray the Full Court also set out the principles relevant to the exercise of the jurisdiction to award costs against a lawyer under the Act. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Tropeano v Dorman, 441 F3d 69, 77-78 [1st Cir 2006] ["Business activities which may continue indefinitely are not 'particular' in nature and do not constitute particular undertakings"]; Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d at 86; Fischer v Fischer, 197 SW3d 98, 104 [Ky 2006], quoting Girard Bank v Haley, 460 Pa 237, 244, 332 A2d 443, 447 [1975]; Miami Subs Corp. v Murray Family Trust, 142 NH 501, 509, 703 A2d 1366, 1371 [1997]; Harshman v… [read post]