Search for: "The Justices v. Murray" Results 461 - 480 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am by Stephen Wermiel
Four years later, the Chief Justice again emphasized the need to base the operation of the Voting Rights Act on current data in Shelby County v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 7:29 am by Mark Ashton
This grew out of Justice David Wecht’s comments in C.G. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am by Eric Yap
 Faced with the male Justices’ insensitivities during oral argument in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:30 am by Joshua A. Geltzer
Murray Snow determined that Arpaio was violating the Constitution by systematically targeting for traffic stops those who looked Latino and detaining those who were deemed undocumented, and ordered Arpaio to stop. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Chief Justice of Ireland, Mr Justice Frank Clarke, announced on Saturday 17 November 2018 that a new Practice Direction will be issued providing guidance on the use of social media and digital devices in the courts. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am by Andrew Hamm
” Stephanie Murray of Politico reports that Democrat Barbara L’Italien, who is running for Congress from Massachusetts, has declared “her intention to file an impeachment resolution against [Justice Clarence] Thomas as part of an effort to address sexual assault if elected. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Tropeano v Dorman, 441 F3d 69, 77-78 [1st Cir 2006] ["Business activities which may continue indefinitely are not 'particular' in nature and do not constitute particular undertakings"]; Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d at 86; Fischer v Fischer, 197 SW3d 98, 104 [Ky 2006], quoting Girard Bank v Haley, 460 Pa 237, 244, 332 A2d 443, 447 [1975]; Miami Subs Corp. v Murray Family Trust, 142 NH 501, 509, 703 A2d 1366, 1371 [1997]; Harshman v… [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
Justice Scalia’s interventions can be followed on the transcript. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am by Stephen Page
The court reaffirmed the principles of when a lawyer might be required to pay costs:In Cassidy v Murray the Full Court also set out the principles relevant to the exercise of the jurisdiction to award costs against a lawyer under the Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am by Aditi Shah
In a sweeping opinion, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by four other justices, decided that the limitations on habeas review in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, to do so cuts across the Court of Appeal’s guidance in Murray v Express Newspapers, which explicitly instructs the court to consider all of the circumstances in which the alleged privacy violation occurred. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:31 am
That was followed by the Department for Work and Pensions' Green Paper Strengthening families, promoting parental responsibility: the future of child maintenance, which set out the Government's controversial proposals for a new child maintenance system.The month concluded with the entertaining Court of Appeal decision in Jones v Jones, which included this quote from barrister Ashley Murray:"There are certain challenges each of us should attempt in our lifetime and… [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The HawkTalk blog has published a list of omissions in the Ministry of Justice Human Rights consultation, including the absence of any consideration or analysis of the impact of the human rights proposals on the current UK_GDPR data protection regime in the UK or how they impact on data subjects (60 million in the UK alone them). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
But the justices — unlike dozens of law clerks and permanent employees of the court — were not made to sign sworn affidavits attesting that they had not been involved in the leak of the draft opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
Via subscription service Lawtel comes His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd, a Chancery Division decision yesterday from Mr Justice Blackburne. [read post]