Search for: "The Justices v. Murray" Results 121 - 140 of 476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am by DARRYL HUTCHEON, MATRIX
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices ruled unanimously in Peter v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:14 am
Murray, Sr.Alexander Spicola BokorPaul AielloGina BeovidesBarbara T. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:47 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the appeal in an age discrimination case involving B.C. lawyer John Michael (Mitch) McCormick.In McCormick v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by David Oscar Markus
Thomas Law Review have put together a symposium next weekend (November 12-13, 2010) entitled Bush v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:21 am by The Murray Law Firm
 Read Our Legal Take to find out if the victim and her family may have a legal avenue to pursue justice and a claim for compensation. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:21 am by Howard Friedman
Austria: The Folly of Europe, [Abstract], 5 Journal of Global Justice & Public Policy 83-105 (2019).Mark Tushnet, Trump v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm by Eric Segall
Bush "woke up every morning for his entire term thinking it was September 12" just like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day, and then W went back to bed and told Cheney to manage things. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:56 am by Josh Mirwis, Olswang LLP
In the case of Murray v Leisureplay plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963, the Court of Appeal adopted the wider approach of ascertaining what the predominant function of the clause was. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Justice Lynch discussed Justice Cooper’s “thoughtful and careful analysis” recently in Travis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Yet this is just one of the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in Murray v Big Pictures [2008] EWCA 446 relevant to whether a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” On Monday, the justices heard argument in Sessions v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm by Ritika Singh
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]