Search for: "The Justices v. Murray"
Results 141 - 160
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
In this week’s case (Roy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:44 pm
Immediately thereafter, she served as counsel in White v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:52 pm
” As Wells posted earlier today, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Clapper v. [read post]
HONESTLY, THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR SHOULD CARRY THE DEATH PENALTY: California Prosecutor Falsifies Tra…
6 Mar 2015, 5:56 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
Pickup added that another case, Murray v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In the court's view, the inmates' claim was governed by Murray v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:33 am
Ginsburg credited Murray’s law review article “Jane Crow and the Law” with giving Ginsburg a “road map” for the equal citizenship stature arguments she made in 1971’s Reed v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am
Murray Snow, U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:41 am
Justice Solomon noted that the Court of Appeals in Murray v McNamara, 303 NY 140, said that: while it was mindful of the legislative policy embodied in then Civil Service Law Section 16 (now Section 52), favoring the filling of vacancies through promotions, under Article 5, section 6 of the Constitution, "the right to appointment is entitled to the same protection as the right to promotion .... [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:48 pm
Murray Demolition Corp.October 1, 2004 (C.A.) 2004 CanLII 31856 (ON CA) Granite Power Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:09 am
For example, he mounted a successful challenge to the segregated law schools in Maryland (in the Maryland Court of Appeals case Murray v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:56 pm
The opinion, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:23 am
Dep't of Justice, 354 F.3d 411, 413-14 (5th Cir.2004)(per curiam)(federal DNA Act); Jones v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:31 am
“Welcome to Groundhog Day,” begins Justice Antonin Scalia in his concurrence in Glossip v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:05 am
Murray & Jonathan B. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may… [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:23 am
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:06 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:37 am
Third District Justice William Murray, Jr., is the pro tem. [read post]
