Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Anderson" Results 21 - 40 of 947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
The clause was created in reference to a real Civil War in which over 750,000 people died in combat. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson” is based on a serious mistake. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am by Dean Falvy
Anderson (2024): “In our democracy, we must trust the people, not unelected judges, to choose our leaders. [read post]
Anderson, a similar lawsuit concerning the former president’s removal from the ballot in Colorado. [read post]