Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Anderson"
Results 441 - 460
of 834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2014, 5:04 am
On IP Draughts, Mark Anderson lists 10 tips for dealing with non-performing licensees [this Kat has a few more, but they're not as constructive ...]. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:11 am
Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
§ 1643 (2014) [24] Anderson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Not even people outside of the business sector would be safe from the Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361, 1370 (Cal. 1971) overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Sharpe and Patricia McMahonMisconceptions: Unmarried Motherhood and the Children of Unmarried Parents Act by Lori ChambersThe Alberta Supreme Court at 100: History & Authority edited by Jonathan SwaingerMy Life in Crime and Other Academic Adventures by Martin Friedland 2006Magistrates, Police & People: Everyday Criminal Justice in Quebec and Lower Canada, 1764-1837 by Donald FysonThe Court of Queen’s Bench of Manitoba 1870- 1950: A Biographical History by Dale BrawnR.C.B. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Anderson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
Here are some of the better ones:From Mark Anderson (Anderson Law, and superb fellow blogger for IP Draughts) came this:A talented kitten called KateBought brands very cheap in KuwaitWhen she got back to BlightyCustoms men got exciteyAnd impounded her counterfeit freight. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Anderson, and D. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
"Disclosing business secrets to share purchasers" is an IP Draughts post by the ever-perceptive Mark Anderson, it being a review of the recent ruling in Richmond Pharmacology Limited v Chester Overseas Limited and others [2014] EWHC 2692 (Ch) noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am
A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:28 am
Why isn't it okay to fire the class of people who admit to illegality? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
In the recent case (Anderson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm
" In the case of Commonwealth v Anderson, 406 Mass 343, 547 NE2d 1134 [1989], the Supreme Court of Massachusetts held that the Commonwealth must carefully comply with written, checkpoint guidelines and that "substantial compliance" is not the standard for a roadblock seizure. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
This was the case in Fox Lake Cree Nation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Almost out there for the taking—Anderson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooper, in his May 29, 2014 decision in Ponorovskaya v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
