Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce" Results 321 - 340 of 798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:04 pm by Parker Higgins
But worse, it cuts right to the core of fundamental computing freedom questions and cues up the next legislative battle to address what software people are allowed to run on their devices. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:43 pm
You can find these opinions by searching for cases (like Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The rule of three was held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535, a case decided in 1911.In applying the Rule of Three, tie scores can allow the appointing authority to make its selection from among far more than three eligibles. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:08 am
We can then follow Akhil Amar's contention that Article V applies to governmental initiated constitutional change and does not prevent the sovereign authority of the people from adopting a more majoritarian process. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Dianne Saxe
 This issue  was most recently addressed in the decision of the Niagara Escarpment Hearing Office on the twinning of the Bruce to Milton transmission line, Barlow v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 7:08 am by Nassiri Law
Perhaps the notoriety given to Olympic athlete and television personality Bruce Jenner will further the cause. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Former federal Liberal political staffer Bruce Lehrmann has dropped his defamation case against News Corp after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:31 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The Supreme Court today took the narrowest and simplest route to upholding an obscure tax provision in Moore v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
(e) He corruptly sells privileged access to himself to a select group which included business people and business lobbyists in return for donations to the Liberal Party. [read post]