Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce"
Results 61 - 80
of 848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 2:00 am
EFF and the ACLU of Northern California filed a lawsuit, called Williams v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
As well, we are seeing a lot of what Toronto Star columnist Bruce Arthur brilliantly called “crayon law” — nonsense legalese drafted by people who have no clue about basic law. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
First, Bruce Ackerman's work on constitutional history suggested the availability of "left originalism" that maintained the commitment to the constitutional will of "We the People" but argued that the constitution included a New Deal constitutional moment that legitimated the legacy of the Warren Court. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Bruce Ball 4. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:06 am
.'” “Fordham Law School professor Bruce Green previously told Bloomberg Law that the narrowness of the SEC’s request—focusing on client names—could ultimately be hard to beat. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:33 pm
In that regard, the closest case I know (and immediately brought up when I commented on the FTC's complaint) is Pistacchio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
Bruce Boyden: can you interview people on the Hill at the time to see what they were talking about. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
” Bruce Gilley is a controversial professor at Portland State University, best known for arguing in favor of colonialism. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:33 am
” In Gilley v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
Krasno v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm
PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Bruce Ackerman advised aspiring constitutional theorists of my generation to learn German. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
So is Bruce Ackerman’s dualist theory. [read post]
