Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce"
Results 161 - 180
of 927
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The company claims that the awards will be "a true reflection of what fans are listening" to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes looked back at a busy year for the Enlarged Board of Appeal, examining, amongst others, some of the more controversial cases that 2019 brought, such as Pepper (G 3/19) and Computer simulated inventions (G 1/19).Rose also provided a breakdown of some of the important Board of Appeal cases of 2019, which included highlights such as a new approach from… [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
In October, three people were charged in connection with smuggling cigarettes on the Staten Island Ferry. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
This year, the preview for Madison v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:31 am
A common misconception still exists in some people’s minds. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
Brookings Senior Fellow Bruce Riedel will launch his new book on the subject and join Senior Fellow Suzanne Maloney in conversation. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
Another critique of the position apparently supported by Barr is that people all over the world already know how to build encrypted systems. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
By way of example, see Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:46 pm
• "Use the names of the people and organizations involved in your Statement of Facts. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
The facts of Corbitt v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:18 am
The FTC moved to strike Qualcomm's opening slides from the Apple v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
