Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Bruce"
Results 161 - 180
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am
After all, in the wake of the Civil War the people who were most determined to assert legal continuity were former Confederates, not radical Republicans. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:14 pm
Cindy first became involved with EFF in 1993, when EFF asked her to serve as the outside lead attorney in Bernstein v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Popular Constitutionalism and Bruce Ackerman’s theory of “constitutional moments” are examples of this approach. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am
Davis’s trial ends because he receives a pardon; the Supreme Court eventually takes Lincoln’s side of the debate in Texas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Bruce Ackerman and others have suggested that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments may not have met Article V’s requirements, but attained legitimacy through other means.Similarly, it may mean that the Nineteenth Amendment and the Equal Rights Amendment can be legitimized through means other than Article V. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 6:38 pm
In Oliver v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:06 pm
” (Bruce v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The company claims that the awards will be "a true reflection of what fans are listening" to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes looked back at a busy year for the Enlarged Board of Appeal, examining, amongst others, some of the more controversial cases that 2019 brought, such as Pepper (G 3/19) and Computer simulated inventions (G 1/19).Rose also provided a breakdown of some of the important Board of Appeal cases of 2019, which included highlights such as a new approach from… [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
In October, three people were charged in connection with smuggling cigarettes on the Staten Island Ferry. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:21 am
This year, the preview for Madison v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:31 am
A common misconception still exists in some people’s minds. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
