Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Clements"
Results 21 - 40
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am
And while some Justices enticed Clement into conceding that a state’s people may act to vary the lawmaking process somewhat, he steadfastly refused to accept that the legislature could be forced entirely to the sideline on the redistricting question. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
Referring to the 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:01 am
At oral argument in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:38 am
The following post comes from Clement S. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:30 pm
Both approaches are rooted in the unique history of the American people. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 10:15 am
In Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
So if yesterday was about party politics and adversarial v. inquisitorial procedure, today is about evidentiary questions coming out of the steroids madness. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:48 pm
Here's the audio and transcript for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:26 pm
[Citation to Romer v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm
CLEMENT: Well, with respect, Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:46 am
They are merely doing their jobs, enabling people to exercise their statutory rights and defend themselves against those in power. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 4:36 am
Last week the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled in Clement et al v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Former Solicitor General Paul Clement marked his fiftieth argument before the Supreme Court with Perdue v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:57 pm
Chapnick, 708 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2013) Peoples National Bank, N.A. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am
Carrying a gun outside the home is a fundamental right that people in 43 other states enjoy, Clement observed. [read post]
