Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Clements"
Results 61 - 80
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2017, 8:10 am
Just say any contract that any of these people sign in any of these fields is exempt. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
In today’s case (Van v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
” Jeff Clements, general counsel of Free Speech for People, a public interest group devoted to overturning Citizens United, lauded the Montana high court’s opinion, writing, “Corporations are not people. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
I have written elsewhere about how to make sense of the “racial v. political” dichotomy that that seems to trouble many people about Indian law. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
[A famous line from NFIB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
Likely there to hear arguments in Nebraska v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
For the two-week February sitting, which has trickled into the first week of March, most people would pick Wednesday’s abortion case, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Clement of King & Spaulding in Washington with 10 minutes for the National Rifle Association. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:46 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
The previous case, called Blue Shield of Virginia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:59 pm
During a series of questions for Clement about the Supreme Court’s decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
Let’s talk about Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:55 pm
It also exempted people who may not share their religious beliefs. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:53 am
Decades ago, long before the Court in Chevron v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:47 am
In Katz v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court to rethink its Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 11:34 pm
Relevant citations: Padilla v. [read post]
