Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Homer"
Results 1 - 20
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
v=F69DQupMiZM (the above is a clip of the Homer moment that I’m thinking of, but my embed function is a bit glitchy so you may need to click and view it on the youtube site to watch). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
Homer nods. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:41 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:39 pm
Justice Scalia’s error in his EPA v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:23 am
People remember the concrete. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
EME Homer City error was, the Reno v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
The question for the ET was whether it is reasonably necessary in order to achieve the legitimate aims of the scheme to deny those benefits to people in the applicant’s position. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 1:21 am
All is well until Homer receives his pay cheque, which includes an additional $5 “bear tax”. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
Homer keeps nodding. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:01 am
That is what Justice Scalia had to say in dissent earlier this month in Boumediene v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
EME Homer City Generation, upholding the agency’s regime to regulate interstate air pollution. [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:50 am
One thing that some people don't know is that the railroads were rooting for Homer Plessy. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The case was State v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:37 pm
Sanford, which held that Black people had no rights white men were bound to respect, or Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:43 am
Sometimes I lean towards not talking about opinions by a particular author because I don't want to sound like a homer. [read post]
