Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 1 - 20 of 772
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2024, 12:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Why didn’t people test 512(j) in court first? [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatedly: probabilistic reasoning: a private plaintiff can win if a substantial number are likely to be deceived, which can be as low as 15%; in a class action, courts think it has to be presumed that 100% are deceived, and they don’t seem happy with numbers that low although they might be willing to go with 40% or 50% Hughes: Surveys aren’t scrutinized for whether they selected reasonable consumers—which affects the “empirical” claim. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
House as symbol of domesticity and arrival in middle class: people buy “sanitized versions” of the “riskless familiar” that seem predictable and safe. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  To add to these difficulties, people are living longer, which means they need their retirement income to last longer. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:35 am by Chris Sutton
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama delivered a decision in the case National Small Business United v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
If the long weekend left you short on time to read the IP news, don't worry, here's the summary of the stories you missed last week.PatentsPhoto by TootSweetCarole via PixabayRose Hughes commented on a recent case about the validity of a patent for the second medical use of a known drug for treating type II diabetes (empagliflozin, or Jardiance™) in a subpopulation of patients. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to West Midlands Police after the force repeatedly mixed up two people’s personal information. [read post]