Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes"
Results 1 - 20
of 717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
Christopher Hughes v Associated Newspapers In a judgment delivered on 22 November 2024, the High Court dismissed proceedings which had been issued by Christopher Hughes against the Daily Mail. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 11:05 am
In a 7-2 decision, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes cited the Dillon precedent. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
”In a later case, Doe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am
She is the author of "Priests of Our Democracy: The Supreme Court, Academic Freedom, and the Anti-Communist Purge," which won the Hugh M. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 5:23 am
From Judge Kari Dooley's opinion last week in Indelicato v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 9:30 pm
As soon as she did, I used it and learned that in 1919 the Court granted Charles Evans Hughes's request that each side receive two hours to argue Commercial Cable Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Board of Education, 1954, and related cases; andCases concerning elections and voting rights in the 1940s and 1950s with one Alabama primary election case, Gray v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 10:32 am
As always, stay tuned.The post Michigan Supreme Court Grants Review in <i>People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928Mari Takayanagi (Parliamentary Archives, UK)23. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:29 pm
DeJoy, and Carson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 8:18 am
From Judge Neeti Pawar's opinion in People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:49 pm
Why didn’t people test 512(j) in court first? [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 7:11 am
Relatedly: probabilistic reasoning: a private plaintiff can win if a substantial number are likely to be deceived, which can be as low as 15%; in a class action, courts think it has to be presumed that 100% are deceived, and they don’t seem happy with numbers that low although they might be willing to go with 40% or 50% Hughes: Surveys aren’t scrutinized for whether they selected reasonable consumers—which affects the “empirical” claim. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:10 pm
House as symbol of domesticity and arrival in middle class: people buy “sanitized versions” of the “riskless familiar” that seem predictable and safe. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Hughes? [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm
"] From today's decision of the Florida Court of Appeal in Doe v. [read post]
