Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes"
Results 281 - 300
of 703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30th November – 1st December 2022 R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council, heard 7th December 2022. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
In this case, which years later Chief Justice Hughes called a "self-inflicted wound," the Court held that Black people were not and could not be citizens of the United States, and that Congress could not end slavery in the territories. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Yet people sometimes cite science when they are trying to justify their own oppressive behavior. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
These other people are sometimes known as informants. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:28 am
The case (Matal v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:56 am
The style of the case is, Canal Indemnity Company v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
” At the Daily Wire, Denise Harle comments on FDA v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:35 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama delivered a decision in the case National Small Business United v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Life is about catching nuancesThis Black v Whiteapproach is funny. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:20 pm
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
From our much-admired former guest Kat and respected blogger Norman Siebrasse comes news that the IPKat has been judicially cited by Hughes J of the Federal Court of Canada in Pfizer Canada Inc v Pharmascience Inc 2013 FC 120 at paragraph 75, for the Kat's explanation of the "Angora cat" approach to claim construction (the cited url is not exactly right -- it says "com-uk" rather than "co.uk"). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:46 am
" The argument that the CTEA was unconstitutional for this very reason was ultimately rejected by the Supreme Court (in Eldred v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
The Kappos people had already found --a therapeutically effective amount--.Optimizing amounts when the effect is demonstrated is usually considered "obvious. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
The first book is a dissection of the Trayvon Martin case with a highly critical analysis of the prosecution’s presentation in People v. [read post]
