Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 281 - 300 of 777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 10:11 am by Katie Bart
Hughes, Sotomayor said that the court has created an “absolute shield” for police officers accused of excessive force. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
In the Hamilton County court, Judge William Hughes, agreed, throwing out the agreement. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
Both Judge Dyk and Hughes dissented from the judgment, raising opposing views on both the applicability of Mallinckrodt and Jazz Photo.In their view, in relation to the first argument of patent exhaustion, the decision in Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc. applies, which sets out that "...the initial authorized sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item". [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Listed for two days from this morning in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In this case, which years later Chief Justice Hughes called a "self-inflicted wound," the Court held that Black people were not and could not be citizens of the United States, and that Congress could not end slavery in the territories. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Until all people, Israelis and Palestinians, between the river and the sea, can live in peaceful liberty. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm by Adam Wagner
Simon Hughes’ comments certainly suggest that change is imminent. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]