Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 301 - 320 of 760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The first book is a dissection of the Trayvon Martin case with a highly critical analysis of the prosecution’s presentation in People v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Kappos people had already found --a therapeutically effective amount--.Optimizing amounts when the effect is demonstrated is usually considered "obvious. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
 From our much-admired former guest Kat and respected blogger Norman Siebrasse comes news that the IPKat has been judicially cited by Hughes J of the Federal Court of Canada in Pfizer Canada Inc v Pharmascience Inc 2013 FC 120 at paragraph 75, for the Kat's explanation of the "Angora cat" approach to claim construction (the cited url is not exactly right -- it says "com-uk" rather than ""). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:46 am by David Post
" The argument that the CTEA was unconstitutional for this very reason was ultimately rejected by the Supreme Court (in Eldred v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:42 am by James Romoser
” At the Daily Wire, Denise Harle comments on FDA v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” For this blog, Justin Marceau analyzes Monday’s opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm by Josh Blackman
I had my law clerks count, actually, not just the people who came in, you know, the 700,000. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am by Adam Wagner
Closed societies encounter terrorism too; it seems a sad reality that people will always find a reason to kill innocent people. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Tushnet
A couple of people referred to the last sentence of Article V, that no state shall without its consent be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 5:43 am
Rose Hughes examined this refusal, which followed a mere 16 minutes of deliberation at an EPO hearing in Munich.Trade MarksAntonella Gentile reported on the judgment of the CJEU in C-143/19 P. [read post]