Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 341 - 360 of 760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
This article critically reviews the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision on the application of human rights laws to law firm partners in McCormick v Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP in an effort to show how the purposive approach is invoked, how it is then either ignored or applied incorrectly, and how the purposive approach ought to have been deployed if we had remained faithful to its structure and demands. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lynch, 15-362, is for all you CAT People out there. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The second instance involves another BBC journalist, Roland Hughes, and his story about his part in helping another 'lifted' photograph to go viral without the author's permission. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Owens: Crying wolf over the Trans-Pacific Partnership Hugh Stephens The TPP’s Intellectual Property Provisions: The “Worst Public Policy Decision in the Country’s History”? [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm by Elina Saxena
A man stabbed and wounded three people in a London subway station. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 Indeed, the practice of obtaining and executing Anton Piller orders was subject to a critical review by Mr Justice Scott in Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson [1986] (and see also the article "Piller problems"(1990) 106 LQR 601 by Professor Dockray and, as he then was, Hugh Laddie QC). [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Cody linked to the recently published report from Lorenzo Vidino and Seamus Hughes of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University entitled ISIS in America: From Retweets to Raqqa. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
The Court granted without first relisting in Hughes v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Those who oppose abortion are, after all, very upset that after the decision in Roe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Critics of this approach, including Sir Hugh Laddie and his discerning followers, poured scorn on this parochial attitude, but most of us thought they were just having a good rant. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
The Judge said that the words complained of had a clear tendency to put people off dealing with the claimant – this was their evident purpose [42]. [read post]