Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 401 - 420 of 758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2017, 3:35 am by NCC Staff
But to many people, the program was more like an albatross. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
Professor Hugh Hansen moderated the first session, Competition Overview and Recent Developments. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:02 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Orin Kerr: internal v. external perspectives. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Different question about length v. breadth while in place. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
Speed is advised since Shireen is limiting attendance to just 12 people -- though this Kat hears that, if there's enough interest, she will run a further Brief. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Criminal Procedure In her book, Kwall discusses the American constitutional case of Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
McGannon Award for work to advance the roles of women and people of color in the media reform movement, and won the 2015 Hugh Hefner 1st Amendment Award for framing net neutrality as a civil rights issue. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
” Since then, people who are actually smart have debated whether the issue remains live and certworthy or not, and even deployed my favorite Supreme Court put-down, the word “baffling. [read post]