Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 421 - 440 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Orin Kerr: internal v. external perspectives. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Criminal Procedure In her book, Kwall discusses the American constitutional case of Dickerson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Different question about length v. breadth while in place. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
McGannon Award for work to advance the roles of women and people of color in the media reform movement, and won the 2015 Hugh Hefner 1st Amendment Award for framing net neutrality as a civil rights issue. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
” Since then, people who are actually smart have debated whether the issue remains live and certworthy or not, and even deployed my favorite Supreme Court put-down, the word “baffling. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court will say about civil marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:11 pm by INFORRM
 They were as follows: Social Media: How many people use Twitter and what do we think about it? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
  Police detained Mark and put him in handcuffs, a move that is authorized for dealing with people at the premises of a house search under Michigan v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 Indeed, the practice of obtaining and executing Anton Piller orders was subject to a critical review by Mr Justice Scott in Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson [1986] (and see also the article "Piller problems"(1990) 106 LQR 601 by Professor Dockray and, as he then was, Hugh Laddie QC). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am by INFORRM
The article, which appeared in The People, had wrongly alleged she was to be investigated over allegations of slavery. [read post]