Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 81 - 100 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2010, 6:52 am by Michael
Giving judgment in Stanton v Collinson [2010] EWCA Civ 81, Lord Justice Hughes said the High Court had declined to reduce the damages awarded to Stanton on the grounds that it had not been shown that wearing a belt would have sufficiently reduced his injuries. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the [54 A.D.3d 885] defendant's statements were voluntarily made, despite the fact that he was experiencing pain from an injured wrist (see People v Hughes, 280 AD2d 694, 695 [2001]; People v Ragin, 224 AD2d 642 [1996]). [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
Although Rajavi is the de facto leader of the People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran, that organisation is now de-proscribed in the UK (but still banned in Iran). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
Supreme Court Judgment Lady Hale, with whom Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes agreed, gave the leading judgment. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
” Antony White QC Opinion: “Defamation and False Privacy” – Hugh Tomlinson QC Is following people illegal? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:12 pm
Governor Walker and the Badger state GOP legislators will emerge far stronger for facing down the fury of the public employee unions, and the people... [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
Aug. 10, 2021) BONUS: Plaintiffs allege that the marketing rights that Stevens and Hughes purchased from Google and Facebook directed searches for the Blaux brand to, where Stevens and Hughes sold products that competed with the Blaux portable air conditioner. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
  In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Developed countries find themselves in position of standing with indigenous peoples against (Hughes said defending) some proposals from developing countries: proposals sometimes put government in charge of controlling, even owning, TCE. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
The lineup is as follows.Sept 18: Daniel Ernst, Professor of Law, Georgetown University, “Chief Justice Hughes and Administrative Law, 1930-1941”Comment: Mark Tushnet, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolSept 25: Karen Tani, Assistant Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley Law, “The ‘Indian Problem’: Welfare, Rights, and Citizenship in the Wake of the New Deal”Comment: Lucie White, Louis A. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
[A comment on a mistaken way to limit computer searches— focusing on People v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]