Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 81 - 100 of 776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review  (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30th November – 1st December 2022 R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council, heard 7th December 2022. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review  (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30 November – 1 December [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:37 am by Sasha Volokh
Today, I'll talk about the second case that people often rely on when they want to argue that there's a rule against private delegations: Carter v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:15 am by Quinta Jurecic
  According to Seamus Hughes of the George Washington University Program on Extremism, a review of recent federal court cases concerning threats against public officials shows a “meteoric rise” in threats since 2016. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am by Steve Gottlieb
The Court in that period was led by Chief Justices Hughes, Stone, Vinson, and Burger as well as Warren. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Some of them are, both metaphorically and, increasingly literally, old friends, but thanks especially to Richard, I am also meeting some new people and, I hope, making brand-new friends, not infrequently from abroad. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Justice Department has charged five people for making threats of violence against election workers amid a rising wave of harassment and intimidation tied to the 2020 presidential race, a top official told the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
Law publishing industry veteran and innovator, Jason Wilson has been pondering on relevant matters as the case of ROSS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Scott Patterson, Siobhan Hughes and Sadie Gurman report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Res. 75/314 Establishing a Permanent Forum of People of African Descent (U.N.), with an introductory note by Chantal Thomas Case of Guzmán Albarracín v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Nov. 15, 2021 Hughes, J.), may be viewed at this LINK.The court Order in Harenza v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Justice William Crain's opinion today (joined by Justices Scott Crichton, James Genovese, Jay McCallum, and Jefferson Hughes III) in State v. [read post]