Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Hughes" Results 101 - 120 of 698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am by Ronald Mann
The second of the Court’s trademark cases this week was Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
However, there are also obvious disadvantages – it seems likely that more people would be encouraged to make complaints. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am by INFORRM
  Once again, we would like to thank all our readers and the many people who have contributed to the success of the blog over this period and particularly the large number of people who have written for us since 2010. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
  Once again, we would like to thank all our readers and the many people who have contributed to the success of the blog over this period and particularly the large number of people who have written for us over the past 5 years. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 10 June 2021 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the “Sun only” claim brought by Sir Simon Hughes. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]