Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Kirk"
Results 1 - 20
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
V. 51, no. 6 (2001), pp. 48–53. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:04 pm
In People v Forbes (2010 NY Slip Op 02349 [4th Dept 3/19/10] the Appellate Division, Fourth Department found that there was a violation of the well settled requirement that "police officers need either a warrant or probable cause plus exigent circumstances in order to make a lawful entry into a home" (Kirk v Louisiana, 536 US 635, 638; see Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 589-590):Where, as here, the People contend that a suspect gave… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm
The amicus brief on behalf of appellants is signed by a gazillion people, and might accurately be titled "Amicus Brief of Most of the Huge Law Firms In California, All of Whom Are Jonesing For PPP and None of Whom Want to Be Conflicted Out. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:01 pm
Elizabeth Dale, People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Kirk M. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Kirk Anderson, and Monica WedgewoodThe Movement for a Right to Counsel in Civil Cases: Turner v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:01 am
Kirk v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:02 pm
I had the pleasure of working with Kirk and Celeste during the certification hearings for the National Indian Residential Schools class action, Baxter v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Kirk M. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Post By Kirk M. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am
Kirk v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
In the case of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:40 am
The agent related that he interviewed two people who had been arrested on drug charges. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Kirk v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:02 am
From the motion for a preliminary injunction in Ricci v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
David NosalUnited States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
Holder, Bond v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 8:27 am
The public policies underlying the use of prior acts evidence predate Pa.R.E. 404 itself, as foreshadowed by Homewood People’s Bank v. [read post]
