Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Knight" Results 1 - 20 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 6:34 am
Many people will buy one, or the other, but not both. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 2:08 pm by Joseph Stacey
Phillips was reported missing after the F/V PACIFIC KNIGHT capsized and sank near Clark’s Point in Bristol Bay on Wednesday, July 25th. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:56 am by The Murray Law Firm
Our Legal Take: 2 Injured in Knights Inn Armed Robbery Local News Two people were reportedly shot and injured during an armed robbery at the Knights Inn motel in northern Jacksonville Sunday morning, August 23, 2015. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by karen
” For the brief: For information about the lawsuit: Contact:  DavidGreeneCivil Liberties [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:23 am
 He is however quite distressed that people like Knight, who go around filing other people's trade marks as though they are his own and then trying to grind them down through persistent, dishonest and apparently vindictive litigation, should be allowed to carry on using the trade mark system without any form of supervision. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:33 pm
 Meanwhile, big loss for immigration people in Jules v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 5:07 am by Eugene Volokh
This week, we discuss that opinion and the potential broader impacts of this case—now known as Biden v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:05 pm by Howard Wasserman
Knight Foundation, holding that the President violated the First Amendment by blocking people on Twitter: Does the ban moot the case and will the Court issue a Munsingwear order vacating the case and remanding with instructions to vacated the judgment. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001) (quoting Ohio v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:40 am by Michael DelSignore
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University is a case that concerns the president blocking people on Twitter. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
With this in mind, the recent judgment of the US Supreme Court in the case of  Biden v Knight First Amendment Institute [pdf] has provided a  refreshing outlook at the issue, following important observation by Thomas J, that some digital platforms might need to be considered as a “common  carrier”, which could possibly mean that they would lose the Section 230 immunity and their sole discretion to withhold service to individual users. [read post]