Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lance"
Results 61 - 80
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
Seeff’s Atlantic Seaboard luxury market specialist, Lance Cohen, views November as an excellent sales month. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:06 am
The only people there were Funk, Lawler, commentator Lance Russell, and a cameraman. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:36 am
" Yeah, sounds like Neil; never one to shy away from high-stakes criminal defense litigation.The Michigan Court of Appeals handed prosecutors a serious weapon when it issued its People v McQueen decision last month. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
The California Supreme Court has ruled that breath tests don't always mean someone is intoxicated even if the result is above the legal limit of .08, People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Bond, the forum will discuss two issues: Why is Legal Aid important to you and the people you work with? [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
" So reads the first line of today's 8-1 SCOTUS decision in the Snyder v Phelps case.By now, the story is familiar to all of us: Albert Snyder's son, Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, was killed in action in Iraq. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
The argument in Bond v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
For example, in Thomas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:02 am
Trademark Policing v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am
" Id. at 27, citing Lance v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:42 am
In answer to a question that people keep asking him, the IPKat does not yet know the exact form of the questions which the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, is proposing to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Nokia v HMRC (see earlier posts here and here), but you can be sure that, once he does know, he'll share the information with all his readers. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
In the absence of proof that real people were exposed to products that were unsafe or ineffective (instead of just improperly promoted), there is simply no injury, and thus no standing, for any sort of claim by a TPP or other beneficiary for purely economic loss. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
LANCE MORRIS, No. 09-0495 Per Curiam The Court presented this as an application of its recent decision in TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
Oh, also, Lance Lowry and I talked about this briefly at the end of my latest podcast. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:52 am
The case is Erickson v. [read post]
