Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lansing" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2016, 8:25 am by Liisa Speaker
The Michigan Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McLain v City of Lansing Fire Department on October 6, 2016 to decide whether to grant leave to appeal. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
He said the rule was unconstitutionally vague because it’s too difficult for people to figure out where the zones begin and end (Doe v Snyder). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:22 pm by stu@crimapp.com
This was a pretty easy argument because the Michigan Legislature specifically passed a law stating that they didn’t want local control on the CCW requirements and wanted to create a standardized state-wide system telling people where they could concealed carry and where they couldn’t (MCL 123.1102). ...This library was not a city or a municipal library, but rather a district library under the control of its open board appointed by Ingham County, the City of Lansing,… [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
State Senator Ron Jelinek (R - Berrien County) has introduced a bill in Lansing to abolish adultery as a crime. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
State Senator Ron Jelinek (R - Berrien County) has introduced a bill in Lansing to repeal adultery as a crime. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 5:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
State Senator Ron Jelinek (R - Berrien County) has introduced a bill in Lansing to abolish adultery as a crime. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
The court engages the seminal question: are people searching for “Comphy” exclusively seeking the manufacturer? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
The Kent result was a fortunate fluke for a relative handful of people. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County.   [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:16 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
In a 2-1 decision, the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that a certificate mailed to a state driver, notifying him of his suspended license, is "testimonial" as that term is used in the constitution thus, the Secretary of State must produce it's clerk at a trial for driving on a suspended license.The case, People v Nunley, arose in a district court in Washtenaw County.   [read post]