Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 1 - 20 of 48,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2025, 7:50 am by Asude Sena Moya
Several opportunities include a Senior Research Associate recruitment from the Faculty of Law at the University of Cambridge. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 7:13 am by Mary B. McCord
  Boasberg did what the Supreme Court has held is the job of the judiciary since Marbury v Madison in 1803: “to say what the law is. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals Judge John Howard's concurrence las month in Ross v. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
" Plaintiffs' reliance on "findings and conclusions" from non-binding cases is of no moment. see People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm by Robert Kuhn
Moreover, the statutory good faith offer is by no means an obscure anomaly or unique to Michigan law. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 2:13 pm by Josh Blackman
After Crawford, however, only theCompulsory Process Clause's "witnesses" are people who must appear in court and take the stand. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 1:58 pm by MEL
Wasaya Airways LP v Air Line Pilots Assn, International (2010) – A pilot was dismissed for making racist remarks about First Nations people on social media. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 11:43 am by Andrew Weissmann
And, of course, law firms routinely represent people and companies sued by the government. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 10:15 am by Unknown
(Völkerrechtsblog, March 2025) [text]Nearly 3,000 people in Italy are stateless or at risk (InfoMigrants, March 2025) [text]- Note: The UNHCR report referenced in this post can be accessed here, in Italian only.Research sheds light on childhood statelessness litigation (ENS Blog, March 2025) [text]Slovenia sets positive example in defending rights by acceding to Statelessness Convention (UNHCR, March 2025) [text]Trump asks Supreme Court to step in on birthright citizenship… [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:02 am by Kathryn Rubino
Our liberties depend on lawyers’ willingness to represent unpopular people and causes, including in matters adverse to the Federal Government. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
And, in anyevent, it is hard to see how else we might proceed if our aim is "to honor the supreme law the people have ordained rather than substituting our will for theirs. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 5:41 am by Eugene Volokh
A short excerpt from Friday's 22,000-word North Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Happel v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am by INFORRM
Over 70,000 people reported complaints in a campaign coordinated by the Good Law Project. [read post]