Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 81 - 100 of 55,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Angela Huyue Zhang (Cleary Gttlieb) discusses Using a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut: Why China's Anti-Monopoly Law was Inappropriate for Renren v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Angela Huyue Zhang (Cleary Gttlieb) discusses Using a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut: Why China's Anti-Monopoly Law was Inappropriate for Renren v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:58 am by Immigration Prof
The Second Amendment's 'People' Problem by Pratheepan Gulasekaram, Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming Abstract The second amendment has a “people” problem. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
    I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am by NCC Staff
In honor of Law Day, here’s a look at 10 people you may recognize who were lawyers at some point in their lives. 1. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Regina v O Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Those who prosecuted defendants charged with immigration offences who might be victims of people-trafficking must be aware of the protocols in relation to such victims enshrined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; defence lawyers must make inquiries if there was credible material showing that their client might have been such a victim, especially if the client was young. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:03 pm by lennyesq
  *** Join the Center for Constitutional Rights, CLEAR, and the law firm of Debevoise & Plimpton for Supreme Court argument in this case, Tanzin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:38 am by Patricia W. Moore
Cody Jacobs (Freedman Fellow, Temple University Beasley School of Law) has published in New Mexico Law Review his article, If Corporations Are People, Why Can't They Play Tag? [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Hila Keren (Southwestern Law School) has posted 303 Creative v Elenis: What's Wrong with Preemtive Litigation of Discrimination on SSRN. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant had originally pleaded guilty for the use of a child in a sexual performance (violation of Penal Law 263.05). [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:52 am
Yesterday, the Court of Appeals reversed this finding - People v Kozlow, 2007 NY Slip 03592. [read post]