Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Lewis" Results 21 - 40 of 882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  Quashing multiple defamation proceedings initiated against media the judge said public servants and constitutional functionaries must be able to face criticism since they owed a solemn duty to the people. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The move comes amid growing U.S. scrutiny of the app, which allows users to create and share short videos of themselves with millions of people worldwide. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
We do not here decide that dispute about the new rule; as we stated in Lewis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:28 am by Amy Howe
” However, Gorsuch explained, it “turns out that the Sixth Amendment’s otherwise simple story took a strange turn” with the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Apodaca v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:57 am by SHG
People like this should not be lawyers. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
  It also has a “Coronavirus Reporting Forum” DCMS Committee chairman Julian Knight repeated the call for more action, saying: “To hear that crackpot theories are leading to people attacking phone masts or threatening telecom workers is sickening and it’s clearly time to act. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
On 17 to 20 March 2020 HHJ Lewis heard the trial in the case of JQL v NTP. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 12:56 am
Full story: Litigation Futures.FF v BM [2020] EWFC B6 (06 March 2020)Appeal by father against order for indirect contact only. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]