Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Price"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2019, 8:06 am
The patents are owned by Mr Philip Price of Preston and licensed to Mr Price's company, Surpawall. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:25 am
The case is Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit admittedly still… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am
Probably the most famous case about this issue is Nebbia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
The NHS functions because the tax payers and the Government pay for it - the people, the equipment, the drugs all cost money. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
I have no opinion about whether the price-gouging claim is valid. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am
I agree with him, but at what price? [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:05 am
The plans, people, processes, technology and pricing that got you to this level will not enable you to transform into the emerging industry. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:26 am
The Ontario government must stop requiring transgendered people to have surgery before they can change the sex designation on their birth certificates, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has ordered.Ruling in XY v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
@gnawledge has formed a legal group of over 200 people focused on pricing. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:11 pm
In the significant New Zealand Court of Appeal decision in Murray v Wishart ([2014] NZCA 461) the judges unanimously ruled that a third party publisher (the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others) was not liable for other people’s comments simply because he “ought to have known” that they contain defamatory material (even if he didn’t actually know of the content of the comments). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
The review says that in general, price comparison websites have represented a major step forward for consumers, enabling them to secure better value when buying goods and services, but that some people are missing out on potential savings because of a lack of trust. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
In People ex rel. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:37 am
Harris v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 5:38 pm
If localities no longer have the discretion to exclude people of color, then that is the price of equality. [read post]
