Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sims" Results 1 - 20 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sims being decided as an Equal Protection case rather, say, than as a Guarantee Clause case requiring elaboration of what one might mean by a “republican form of government. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)) might “require[e] something radically different from the present system. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm by NARF
Sims (State Criminal Jurisdiction Over Non-Indians in Indian Country) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/3/22: Acres v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:56 pm by John Floyd
It results in the persecution of innocent people based on their skin color. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:45 am by Unknown
"A Commentary on the African Commission's General Comment on the Right to Freedom of Movement and Residence under Article 12(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights," Journal of African Law, vol. 65, no. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:23 am by Mark Graber
Sims (one basket/one point). [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sga’nism Sim’augit (Chief Mountain) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]