Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sims" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2021, 8:45 am by Unknown
"A Commentary on the African Commission's General Comment on the Right to Freedom of Movement and Residence under Article 12(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights," Journal of African Law, vol. 65, no. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:23 am by Mark Graber
Sims (one basket/one point). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Sims' one person-one vote rule, which itself was a response to racist districting to keep Blacks from having any real voting power. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sga’nism Sim’augit (Chief Mountain) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm by Michele Goodwin
 In the wake of both Whole Woman’s Health and June Medical Services v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
As the judge commented, “spying on a journalist would be to investigate the people with whom the journalist is in contact. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
” This provision was to be interpreted in the light of the common law background, which the Supreme Court summarised as follows [6-7]: “[A] working definition of what makes a statement defamatory, derived from the speech of Lord Atkin in Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, 1240, is that “the words tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
There was a half-hearted effort by a cop speaking "on" the legislation to preserve the real-time vs. historic location information distinction that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals tried to stake out in Sims v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by David Kris
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]