Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sims"
Results 141 - 160
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
I‘ve never seen so many people so eager to get out of here. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
Sims said after the hearing the house needs to be protected because of threats to burn it down. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
[Post by Venkat] Saffold v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity" GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents has been… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:36 pm
"So I am concerned about the 5 hours, about the lack of recusal for cause, about the very, very brief questions that he provided to people who had said on the questionnaire they could be -- they could be biased. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
The Justices seemed far more interested in the jury issue than in the other high-profile question before them in Skilling v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Sims. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
Many people think that the computer program exclusion means that there should be no patent protection available for computer programs at all. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Section on Indian Nations and Indigenous Peoples Breakfast ? [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:01 pm
" Just 46 people were questioned-eight more than the minimum necessary-and only for a few minutes each. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:29 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:47 am
US Supreme Court: Oral Arguments for Jones v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
My good friend and colleague, Dorothy Sims, from Ocala Florida, wrote this article on the Fake Bad Scale. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Indeed, Justice Antonin Scalia earlier this year urged the Supreme Court to take up the issue in his dissent from denial of certiorari in Sorich, et al v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
My good friend and colleague, Dorothy Sims, from Ocala Florida, wrote this article on the Fake Bad Scale. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Okor v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:29 pm
I'm not saying that Justice Sims is wrong and I'm right. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:15 am
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";This article looks at the law of defamation, it's defences and possible remedies.A defamatory statement is one which tends to lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally (Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 ALL ER 1237 and can be split into two areas: libel (this is recorded defamatory material) and slander (spoken). [read post]