Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sullivan" Results 41 - 60 of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Sullivan, the 1964 landmark ruling that says public officials cannot sue people for libel unless they can prove actual malice motivated the speaker to utter falsehoods about him. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 10:13 am by Howard Wasserman
What do people want to eliminate--the actual malice requirement or the larger edifice created in later cases? [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:35 am by Paul Horwitz
Paul Horwitz The leak of the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:29 am
 I'm not sure about love, but after yesterday's arguments before the US Supreme Court in Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm by Michel-Adrien
Undoubtedly, the public responded most strongly to R v Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 [Sullivan], in which the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) held that s. 33.1 of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:57 am by Mark Tushnet
Sullivan goes too far in insulating from liability those who make false and reputation ally damaging statements about other people (mostly "mere" public figures, but perhaps some public officials). [read post]
17 May 2010, 11:41 am by Steve Hall
Bryan Stevenson, Director of the Equal Justice Initiative, argued the companion case, Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:34 pm
County Court, Sullivan County New York: People v. [read post]