Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ware" Results 21 - 40 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am by David Kemp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit extended its decision to keep sealed the videos from Perry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am by David Kemp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit extended its decision to keep sealed the videos from Perry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:51 am by David Canton
You are now the first person to register that trademark in Canada for your wares and services. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am by Dr. Stuart Baran
Mr Ainsworth is happy, though: all that the justiciability finding means for him is that he can’t sell his wares in the US, which he had long since stopped. [read post]