Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ware"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit extended its decision to keep sealed the videos from Perry v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
(Contrast this result with Low v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:21 pm
In R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:57 pm
Famous Horse, Inc. v. 5th Avenue Photo, Inc., 08-4523-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:13 pm
A traditional telephone company laid physical wires to create a network connecting people. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 1:01 pm
This is reminiscent of the test laid out in Brandenburg v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:02 pm
” Who might these people be? [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:51 am
You are now the first person to register that trademark in Canada for your wares and services. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 4:00 pm
Tucker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act… [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
Mr Ainsworth is happy, though: all that the justiciability finding means for him is that he can’t sell his wares in the US, which he had long since stopped. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:33 am
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. [read post]
