Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ware"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act… [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:27 pm
South AfricaKoko v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
According to some really smart people the Uniform Directed Trust Act’s solved this liability problem as well as all the other ancillary issues that come with these new split-duty relationships. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
Waring that Batson doesn’t require a showing that an unlawful factor is the sole reason motivating a peremptory strike. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 2:07 pm
” People v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:23 am
A recent case, Otto v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
Jacob Ware dropped from the docket after he was declared incompetent to stand trial on account of delusions and paranoia, and Joshua Clough pleaded guilty to a weapons charge at the end of 2011. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The Court overturned the convictions in the Moore et al. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The courts must be partners with their users, including those without representation, to help them solve the puzzle of legal processes, to enable them to meaningfully participate (to paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pintea v Johns). [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
And in Ware v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Waring, 364 N.C. 443, 478 (2010) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The veteran BBC journalist John Ware has launched legal action against the Labour party over his controversial Panorama investigation into allegations of antisemitism last year. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
How are these people going to pay an additional tax? [read post]
