Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ware" Results 21 - 40 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The courts must be partners with their users, including those without representation, to help them solve the puzzle of legal processes, to enable them to meaningfully participate (to paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pintea v Johns). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am by Peter Groves
But whatever the law means, we can probably assume that the trade mark RED BULL, and the same trade mark owner's figurative trade marks (what normal people would call logos) or at least some of them, have reputations. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The veteran BBC journalist John Ware has launched legal action against the Labour party over his controversial Panorama investigation into allegations of antisemitism last year. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
How are these people going to pay an additional tax? [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" DNA evidence might exonerate someone, he said, then when people looked back to say, "why was that person convicted? [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Lessons from the Not-So-Distant Past The closest analogy in the Supreme Court's cases is the unanimous decision in Hurley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]